NWO Tavistock Doc 4


Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political and
Economic Decline of the United States.
Emery states that over the past 50 years that experiments in applied social psychology and resultant "crisis management" have taken over all aspects of life in America and the results are stored in the computers in the major "think tanks" such as Stanford University. The scenarios are taken out, used and revised from time to time and, according to Tavistock, "the scenarios are in operation at the present time." 

Translated this means that Tavistock has the majority of the American people profiled and brainwashed. If any part of the American public is ever able to identify the cause of the crises that have washed over this nation in the past seventy years, the social engineering structure built by Tavistock will come crashing down. But that has not yet happened. Tavistock continues to drown the American public in its sea of created public opinion.

The social engineering developed by the Social Sciences scientists at Tavistock has been used as a weapon during this century's two world wars, especially World War I. The pollsters who developed it have been quite frank that they employ on the American population the same devices and methods used and experimented with against enemy populations. Today, the manipulation-by-polls of public opinion has become a central technique in the hands of the social engineers and controllers of the Social scientists employed at Tavistock and its many "think tanks" located all over the United States and Britain.
Page 25
As I have previously related, the modern science of making public opinion through advanced techniques of manipulating mass-opinion began at one of the West's most advanced propaganda factory situated in Britain at Wellington House. This facility dedicated to social engineering and creating public opinion at the commencement of World War I, was under the aegis of Lords Rothmere and Northcliffe, and the future director of studies of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), Arnold Toynbee. Wellington House had an American Section, whose most prominent members were Walter Lippmann and Edward Bernays. As we discovered later, Bernays was the nephew of Sigmund Freud, a fact carefully hidden from public view. Jointly, they centered work on techniques to "mobilize"support for World War I among the masses of people who were opposed to war with Germany. The public perception was that Germany was a friend of the British people, not an enemy and the British people saw no need to fight Germany.

After all, was it not true that Queen Victoria was the cousin of Kaiser Wilhelm II? Toynbee, Lippmann and Bernays worked
to persuade them that war was necessary, using the techniques of the new science through new arts of mass-manipulation via
the communications media for its propaganda purposes tinged with willingness to lie, which was just getting into its stride, having learned a great deal of experience during the Anglo-Boer War (1899-1902). It was not only the British public whose perception of events had to be altered, but also a recalcitrant American public.

To this end Bernays and Lippmann were instrumental in getting Woodrow Wilson to establish the Creel Committee, which created the first body of methodological techniques for dissemination of successful propaganda and for the science of polling to secure the "correct" opinionFrom the beginning the techniques were designed in such a way that polling (public opinion-making) was based on one obvious, but striking feature: — it was concerned with people's opinions, not with their understanding of the
processes of science. Thus, by intent, the pollsters elevated anessentially irrational element of mind to a primary level of
public focus. This was a conscious decision to undermine the grasps of reality of masses of people in an increasingly
complex industrial society.
If you have ever watched "Fox News" where viewers are given the results of a poll about "what Americans are thinking," and then for the next hour found yourself shaking your head and wondering what the results of the poll reflected about your own thinking processes, then you could only have felt more puzzled than ever. The key to understanding Fox News and the poll might lie in
what Lippmann had to say about such matters. In his 1922 book, Public Opinion, Lippmann outlined Tavistock's psychological warfare methodology. In an introductory chapter, "The World Outside and the Pictures in Our Heads," Lippmann stressed, "that the object of study of the public opinion social analyst is reality as defined by internal perception or images of that reality.
Public opinion deals with indirect, unseen, and puzzling facts, and there is nothing obvious about them. The situations
to which public opinions refer are known only as opinions...." 

"The pictures inside the heads of these human beings, the pictures of themselves, of others, of their needs, purposes, and relationship, are their public opinions. Those pictures, which are acted upon by groups of people, or by individuals
acting in the name of groups, are Public Opinion with capital letters. The picture inside so often misleads men in their
dealings with the world outside." From this evaluation, it is easy to take the next decisive step made by Bernays, — that the elites who run society can and do marshal the resources of mass communications to mobilize and alter the "herd" mind.
One year after Lippmann's book, Bernays authored Crystallizing Public Opinion. He followed that in 1928 with a book entitled quite simply: Propaganda. In the first chapter, "Organizing Chaos" Bernays wrote: The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized, habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power of our country.

We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas-suggested, largely by men, that we have never
heard of... Our invisible governors are, in many cases, unaware of the identity of their fellow members in the inner
cabinetWhatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives,
whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conductor or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons—a trifling fraction of our hundred arid twenty million—who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. 
It is they who pull the wires, which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world. In Propaganda, Bernays followed his praise of the "invisible government" by underscoring the next phase that propaganda techniques would followAs civilization has become more complex, and as the need for invisible government has been increasingly demonstratedthe technical means have been invented and developed by which opinion may be regimented. With the printing press and the newspaper, the telephone, telegraph, radio and airplanes, ideas can spread rapidly and even instantaneouslyover the whole of America.

To back up his point, Bernays quoted the mentor of "public opinion manipulation," H. G. Wells. He cited a 1928 article in the New York Times in which Wells welcomed "modern means of communication" for "opening up a new world of political processes," and for allowing "the common design" to be "documented and sustained against perversion and betrayal." For Wells, the advent of "mass communication" leading up to television meant fantastic new paths for social control beyond the wildest dreams of the earlier massmanipulation fanatics of the British Fabian Society. We shall return to this vitally important subject later herein.

Page 29
For Bernays, his recognition of Wells' idea won him a key place in the hierarchy of U.S. public opinion controllers; in 1929, he won a position at CBS, which had recently been taken over by William Paley. By the same token, the advent of mass communications ushered in the polling/sampling industry, to organize theperceptions of the masses for the media mafia (part of the "invisible government" running the show from behind the scenes.By 1935-36, polling was in full swing. In the same year, Elmo Roper began his Fortune magazine FOR surveys, which evolved into his "What People Are Thinking" column for the New York Herald Tribune.

George Gallup initiated the American Institute of Public Opinion; — in 1936 he opened up the British Institute of Public Opinion. Gallup was to headquarter his activities around Princeton University, intermeshing with the Office of Public Opinion Research/Institute for International Social Research/Psychology Department complex run by Hadley Cantril, who was destined to play an increasingly important role in developing the psychological profiling methods later to be used in manufacturing the Aquarian ConspiracyIn the same 1935-36 period, the first-time use was made of polling in presidential elections, under the impetus of two newspapers owned by the Cowles family, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and the Des Moines Register. The Cowles are still in the news business.
Based in Spokane, Washington, they are active opinion makers and their support of the Bush war in Iraq was a crucial factor.
It is not certain who introduced the practice of "advisors to the President," - those persons who are not elected by the
citizens and whom they have no opportunity to vet, but who decided the internal and external foreign policies of the
Nation. Woodrow Wilson was the first American President to make use of the practice. Opinion Research and World War II
These were all small lead-ups to the next phase, triggered by two important intersecting developments: the arrival of
emigre psychological warfare expert Kurt Lewin in Iowa, and the involvement of the United States in World War II.

World War II provided the emerging Tavistock Social sciences scientists with enormous scope for experimentation.
Lewin's leadership put together the key-force that would deploy after World War II to utilize those techniques developed in warfare against the population of the United States. In fact in 1946, Tavistock declared war on the civilian population of the United States and has remained in a state of war ever since. The basic conceptions expounded by Lewin, Wells, Bernays,
and Lippmann remained in place as the guidepost for manipulation of public opinion; the war gave the Social scientists the opportunity to apply them in highly concentrated form and to bring together a large number of institutions under their direction to further the ends of their experiments.
The core institute which was the vehicle for making "public opinion," was the Committee on National Morale. Ostensibly
established to mobilize support for the war in much as President Wilson had set up his management committee to "manage" WWI, its real purpose was to carry out the intensive profiling of both the "Axis" and Americans population for the purposes of creating and maintaining a means of social control. The committee was headed by several leaders of American
society, including Robert P. Bass, Herbert Bayard Swope, among other notables. Its secretary was Margaret Meade's
husband, Gregory Bateson, one of the principal instigators of the CIA's notorious "MK - Ultra" LSD experiments that some
experts consider as the launch vehicle for the U.S. counterculture of drugs, rock and sex
The committee's Board of Trustees included poll-taker George Gallup; intelligence agent Ladislas Farago and Tavistock psychologist, Gardner Murphy. The committee ran a number of special projects, the most important being a major study on how best to wage Psychological Warfare on Germany. The key personnel critical to the development of the public opinion project
* Kurt K. Lewin, Education and History; Psychology; Social Sciences
* Professor Gordon W. Allport, Psychology
* Professor Edwin G. Borin, Psychology
* Professor Hadley Cantril, Psychology
* Ronald Lippitt, Social Sciences
*Margaret Mead, Anthropology, Social Sciences; Youth & Child Development

The staff numbered more than a 100 researchers who comprised the staff of the Committee, and several opinionprofiling
institutions critical to the project. One such a special project team was in the Office and Strategic Services (OSS) (the forerunner of the CIA) composed of Margaret Mead, Kurt Lewin, Ronald Lippitt, Dorwin Cartwright, John K. French and public-opinion
makers like Samuel Stouffer (later chairman of the Laboratory Social Relations group at Harvard University); Paul Lazarsfeld of Columbia University's Sociology Department, who developed with profiler Harold Lasswell an "opinion research" methodology for the OSS based on detailed "content analysis" of the local press of enemy countries and Rensis Likert.

Likert, a Prudential Insurance Company key executive immediately before the war, had perfected profiling techniques as the director of research for the Life Insurance Agency Management Association. This equipped him to interact favorably with the head of the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey, who was the former head of Prudential Life Insurance Company. Likert served as director of the division of morale of the Strategic Bombing Survey from 1945-1946 from which position he had enormous scope for mass public opinion profiling and manipulation.

Page 33
According to Tavistock Institute records, the Strategic Bombing Survey played a key role in forcing Germany to its knees through a highly disciplined program of systematic bombing of German worker housing, which Sir Arthur Harris of the RAF was only too delighted to carry out. In addition, from 1939-1945, Likert ran the Division of Program Surveys of the Department of Agriculture, from which major studies were undertaken in the techniques of "mass persuasion." Or to put it another way, "making public opinion to fit the desired goals." One can only speculate on the numbers of citizens who believed their support for the "Allied" war effort sprang from their own opinions. One of Likert's key aides in the division was Lewin protege and future Tavistock operative Dorwin Cartwright, who wrote the text-book document titled, "Some Principles of
Mass Persuasion " which is still in use today.

Another major agency for shaping public opinion was the Office of War Information, directed by Gardner Cowles for much of the war effort. Bernays was brought into OWI as an advisor. It is out of the nexus we have described here that the network of key "polling institutions" emerged after World War II. They have played a powerful and decisive role in American life ever since. Gallup, from the committee on National Morale's Board of Trustees, upgraded his activity and became the key commander of polling institutions for launching new policies of the Committee of 300, which he passed off as "polling results."
Bernays played several key postwar roles. In 1953, he wrote a paper for the State Department that recommended setting
up a psychological warfare office by State. In 1954, he was a consultant to the U.S. Air Force, the armed forces branch
most under the influence of the Strategic Bombing Survey people. During this early 1950s period, Bernays was public relations
counsel to the United Fruit (United Brands) Corporation, one of the leading corporations in the communication/national
security apparat (Eisenhower's "military-industrial complex") then busy with consolidating its power over U.S. policy.
Bernays conducted the propaganda campaign alleging Guatemala was falling under "Communist control" that resulted in a U.S. engineered coup in that country

In 1955 Bernays wrote a book about his experience titled "The Engineering of Consent." The book became the virtual Tavistock blueprint followed by the U.S. Government to overthrow any country whose policies were unacceptable to the One World Government Socialist dictatorship. Throughout the postwar period, Bernays was a member of the Society for Applied Anthropology, one of Margaret Mead's social-control institutions inside the U.S., and the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, a group created by John Rawlings Reese, a founder member of Tavistock to run "psychiatric shock troops" among the American population. One of its first actions was the unlashing of homosexuality in Florida, a move bitterly opposed by Anita Bryant who had no idea of what she was up against.
The second of its actions was to introduce the theme that non-white people are more intelligent than whites, which we shall discuss later. Likert moved to the University of Michigan to set up the Institute for Social Research (ISR) that absorbed the
Massachusetts Center for the Study of Group Dynamics, the principal Tavistock affiliate in the U.S. in the beginning of the
postwar eraTavistock's ISR was the center of a number of critical profiling and "Opinion Research" subgroups, among them
the Center for research in the Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, was established by Likert OSS co-worker and Lewin disciples, Ronald Lippitt. 

Project Director Donald Michael was a leading player in the Club of Rome, and a second subgroup, the Survey Research Center, was Likert's own personal creation that grew to become the most elaborate institution in the U.S. for "surveying" (creating) popular attitudes and trends, among the principal of which were demeaning and degrading womanhood and pushing the superior intellectual capabilities of non-white persons according to Lewin's carefully crafted scriptsRobert Hutchins became famous during this period and his closest colleague in those early years was William Benton, the founder in 1929 with Chester Bowles of Benton and Bowles, the well-known advertising firm. Benton utilized Benton and Bowles as a means to develop the science of mass control through advertising.

For the Original Tavistock pdf, look below to download it to your device!

July 31st 2020 Rev- 1
Mark Aldrich,
Aug 2, 2020, 1:21 AM