NWO Tavistock Doc 7


Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political and Economic Decline of the United States.
As the Duke of Windsor put it in his memoirs, A King's Story: "The force of change had not yet thrust so deeply into the
texture of British society as to have obliterated much of the old elegance ...........During the so-called London season the West End was an almost continuous ball from midnight until dawn.... The evening could always be saved by recourse to one or another of the gay nightclubs, which had then become so fashionable and almost respectable." (The word "gay" at that time meant "happy". It was not coopted as a euphemism for sodomy until the mid-fifties.) Nor did the Duke explain that the "force of change" was expertly applied by the Tavistock Institute.

The declining female modesty that became noticeable soon after the end of WWI, suddenly appeared everywhere and with increased velocity. To the uninformed, it was a social phenomenon. Nobody could have suspected that Wellington House and its sinister social engineers were its cause. Accompanying this testamentary emancipation was a movement of revolt, particularly among young people, against every conventional restraint of mind or body coming to a close amid the shattered idols of the fallen empires. The postwar generation in Europe revolted against every more and custom, as they fought desperately to throw off the horrors of war they had lived through. Necklines plunged, public smoking and drinking became a form of revolt.

Homosexuality and lesbianism became demonstrable, not from any inner conviction, but by way of protest at what had 
happened, and as a rebellion against what the war had destroyedRadical and revolutionary excess manifested itself in art,
music and fashion. "Jazz" was in the air and "modern art" was thought to be "chic." The comprehensible element in
everything was "don't have a care"; it was unsettling and unreal. Those were the years when all of Europe was shellshocked.
Wellington House and Tavistock had done their work well. Underneath the hectic sense of being propelled forward by
uncontrollable events there was a spiritual and emotional numbness. The horror of the war in which millions of young
men were needlessly slaughtered, maimed, wounded and gassed was just now beginning to register, so the thing to do
was "blot it from remembrances."
The casualties made wars all too real in its ghastly and cruel ugliness, and people recoiled from it in shock and revolution,
in the despair brought by disillusionment of peace. Europeans, with their superior culture that epitomized Western civilization were shell-shocked to a greater degree than were Americans. They lost their faith in the rudiments that made the progress
that had sustained their fathers and their grandfathers and made their nations great. And this was particularly true of
Germany, Russia, France, and England. Thinking people could not come to grips with why the world's two most civilized and advanced nations had torn each other to pieces and taken the lives of millions of their finest young manhood. It was as if a terrifying madness had gripped Britain and Germany.

To the initiated it was not madness, but the methodology of Wellington House that gripped the British youth. The fear that it might happen again was what almost prevented the outbreak of WWIIOfficers returning from the carnage described to the news
journals the horrors of hand-to-hand combat that had frequently occurred in "the Great War." They were appalled and aghast, horrified and afraid. None of them could understand why there had been a war at all. The dark secrets of Wellington House and the "Olympians" remained hidden, even as they are hidden to this very day

Where once the laying of a wreath at the Cenotaph in Whitehall, London by the Monarch of England had brought solace, it now engendered bitterness, anger and loathing. The stage was being set for the Second World War in which Tavistock was to play a huge, disproportionate role. There were the few thinkers who did have something to say: Spengler, in history for example, Hemingway, Evelyn Waugh in literature, and in America Upton Sinclair and Jack London, but their message was also gloomy, even gloomier than Spengler's dark foreboding of the inevitable decline of Western civilization.
It was confirmed by the postwar degradation of personal relationships. Divorce and cheating on one's wife happened
more frequently. The beautiful concept of women on a pedestal, women soft and feminine, with a lovely voice filled with cadences, the flower of God's creation, the mystery, was a vanishing ideal. In her place came the strident, the loud, the
vulgar with clattering grating speech such as was aped and made popular by a one particular popular morning talk show.

Nobody could possibly know that this sad decline was the end product of Tavistock having declared war on Western
womanhood. In Europe after WWI, the Montparnasse in Paris had become a sad place. Postwar Vienna, emptied by the tide of war that had swept so many of her sons away, was even sadder. But Berlin, once so bustling and so clean, became the Babylon of
Europe and perhaps the saddest place of them all. 

"Whoever lived through these apocalyptic month, these years, became disgusted and embittered, sensed the coming of a counter-blow, a horrible reaction," wrote the historian, ZweigThe political, spiritual, and social bankruptcy of the new power elites, who succeeded the monarchs, the aristocrats and the old-fashioned bourgeois dynasties, was in many respects more spectacular than that of their predecessors, and nowhere more so than in the United States, with the coming of the Socialist era under Franklin D. Roosevelt. This time, however, the eclipse of leadership was not localized in one continent or limited to any particular class of society.
The geographical New World, in terms of the problems that confronted it, the America of Franklin Roosevelt soon demonstrated that the United States was scarcely less anachronistic than the Austria-Hungary of Franz Joseph had been. Here he was establishing a "Democratic" New World Order Socialism straight out of the model created by the Fabian Society, while the United States was a confederated constitutional Republic, the exact opposite. Neither the shift of the European locus of power and prestige from the former Central Empire Western democracies, nor the replacement of the traditional ruling classes within the
fallen monarchies to the United States, did anything to the improve economic, political, social, moral or religious climate of the post WWI world. 

The Wall Street Crash and the Depression that followed, bear eloquent, if silent witness to the truth and accuracy of our statement. The manner in which this event was contrived by the Tavistock Institute can be seen in the timetable of events that which we provide in the Appendix. 
Page 69
The United States of America has long been the most fertile ground for the wholesale spread of propaganda, its people having been connived, lied to, cheated, at which the British have always led the world, the premiere mind controlbrainwashing and propaganda center in the world being the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. Its forerunner was the organization put together by Lord Northcliffe, who married into the Rothschild family, and who was ably assisted by Lord Rothmere and the Americans, Walter Lippman and Edward Bernays. From this modest beginning in 1914 grew the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, which has no peer when it came to creating propaganda. Tavistock is a facility dedicated to the propagation of propaganda to suit every aspect of life. Tavistock approached propaganda as if it were going into battle, and in a sense, it was. There are no halfmeasures; it was a war where anything goes as long as it assures victory.

Surveying the political scene one cannot escape the fact that in the past two decades, the increase in depth and volume of
propaganda, and more especially, mind control, has become all pervasive. The correct application of propaganda to any
theme, whether it is economic, or political, is an essential element in the control-mechanism of government. Stalin once said that if one wanted a docile population then fear and terror had to be unleashed against them. In a sense that is what happened in the United States and Britain. 
The Second World War provided unlimited opportunities of developing propaganda into a fine art. Looking back on the efforts made by the Roosevelt administration to cause the American people — who were 87 percent against going to war in Europe change their minds, we find that in spite of everything, Roosevelt did not succeed. The American people rejected entry into the war in Europe.

It took a contrived situation, a contrived pre-chosen pretext, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, to reverse public opinion
in favor of America's entry into the European war. Roosevelt held out that America was fighting for democracy and its very
way of life, neither of which bore the slightest resemblance to the truth; the war was fought to advance the cause of International Socialism toward its goal of a New World Order inside a One World Government. Propaganda, to be successful, must be aimed at the total population and not at individuals or individual groups, the purpose being to attract the widest possible attention. It is not intended as personal instruction. Facts play no role in propaganda which is always to create an impression. 

It has to one-sided systematic, sustained indoctrination that what the Government, the media and political leaders are saying is the truth. And it has to be pitched in such a manner that the people feel that it is their thinking. Thus, propaganda has to be directed at mass audiences where its message will make its mark. Let us take a recent example of the type of propaganda that would usually be embraced by a receptive audience. In the wake of the World Trade Center disaster, President Bush created a new Government agency, which he called the Office of Homeland Security, and appointed a director to oversee the agency.
Now this sounds very comforting and very soothing until we look at the 10th Amendment, which reserves all such powers as Mr. Bush proposed to seize, to the several States. The fact that Mr. Bush cannot overrule the 10th Amendment was blithely ignored. The propaganda blurb says he can, and since it was directed to the masses, they believed the blurb, rather than their Constitution, and so there was little effective opposition to this gross violation of the Constitution, particularly the 10th Amendment. Bush appears to have been operating under the Stalin directive: "If you want to control the people, first terrorize them." 

Those who opposed the "Homeland Security" quasi-law, were dubbed, "unpatriotic" and "favoring terrorism." Again,
the absolute fact that this bogus act is no law at all and is sheer propaganda was never called into question, but was accepted by the "rah-rah" unthinking public. Public opinion is made in this way and public opinion is what swayed legislators to vote for "Homeland Security" or any other bogus laws, as Bernays and Lippmann both asserted in the very early days of Wellington House. 

The legislators vote along party lines as in the British Parliamentary system, and do not vote on the basis of the U.S.  Constitution. They knew that to oppose the President, they stand a good chance of losing a cozy job at the next election, or face being smeared by some sleazy muck-racking "administration" man. America is not one "homeland" but 50 distinct and separate
States. In any case the word "homeland" comes straight out of the Communist Manifesto. Since the ultimate goal of government is to establish a New World Order International Communist One World Government, the choice of this word to title Communist legislation, should not surprise us.
The power to control Education, Welfare and Police Powers belongs to the States where it has always resided, and it was not taken away from the States at the time of the covenant. Neither President Bush nor the House and Senate have any power to change that, which the newly created office proposed to do. It was only through the exercise of sustained, systematic, repetition of propaganda that the people of the States accepted this gross violation of the U.S. Constitution. The drumbeat of propaganda continued through numerous articles about the background and experience of the "Homeland Director" and what his job is etc., but there is not one word about the blatant unconstitutionality of the new department. It will not escape your notice that the very title: "Homeland Security" is a clever little bit of propaganda. The people are now convinced that not only is the new agency constitutional, but that it is also necessary. The mass of people has now been successfully "mind controlled" (brainwashed.)

Those who wish to study the matter instead of merely watching the CBS Evening News will find something quite different from an account of an independent commentator and the accounts in the press. As always, such person will be in the minority, so that his opinions, even if expressed, will not alter the purpose and intent of setting up the new agency. say to you that the United States is forbidden by its Constitution and the constitutions of the separate 50 States from having any central Federal control mechanism imposed upon them. The so-called "Homeland Security" bill is a travesty, because it destroys the Republican form of
government granted to the original states in the 10th Amendment, and which cannot be taken away from them.
The so-called "Homeland Security Act" is therefore, null and void and no law at all. Yet, the brainwashed inner-directed victims of Tavistock will obey it as if it were law. In short the Homeland Security agency is a deception and it cannot be made law. No measure that is unconstitutional can be enacted into law and the Congress has urgent duty repeal the "law" that gave illegitimate birth to the "Homeland" and "Patriot" Acts forthwith. The cardinal point to remember is that propaganda and mass brainwashing must always be viewed in relation to the end it is intended to serve. 

In this instance it convinces the populace, that liberties must be sacrificed in exchange for "protection." Henry Clay, the greatest constitutional scholar who ever lived called the ploy "a doctrine of necessity, a doctrine from Hell" and utterly condemned such attempts. H.V. Dicks taught at Tavistock. He stated that individual rights have to be sacrificed for the good of all! That includes the measure violating the highest law of the land! It must be accepted because it is for the good of all! This is better explained if we take as an example, the propaganda and brainwashing that accompanied President Roosevelt's desperate efforts to involve the United States in the war going on in Europe, via Japan.

When the anticipated attack on Pearl Harbor happened, (Roosevelt knew the day and the time it would take place) announced in his speeches written for him by the Tavistock Institute, that the American people would be fighting for the highest and noblest of causes, the defense of the nation, defense of freedom and for the future security and well-being of the nation. As is usual in such cases, the facts spoke of a far different set of objectives. 
Roosevelt did not say that the American people were going to
war to fight for the advancement of International Socialism and for the goals of the New World Order -International Communism, One World Government. The American people were told that Germany intended to enslave the world. This was a very good line because even the most poorly educated of people realize that slavery is one of the worst fates that mankind could be called on to suffer. By introducing the word "slavery" a sympathetic chord was struck.

Once again, propaganda bore no relationship to the facts. Thinking persons, not susceptible to propaganda, would have realized that a small nation like Germany could not possibly enslave the world even if had wanted to do so. The resources and manpower were just not there. Germany did not possess the vast maritime fleet to make such an attack on the United States a real possibility. The promoters of the war realized from the very outset that for momentum to be maintained, a sustained blast of propaganda would be necessary. 

The same principle was followed by Vice President Cheney in the weeks preceding the U.S. attack on Iraq; he distorted facts, delivered blast after blast of "fear rhetoric" and twisted intelligence information to fit his purposes. Nobody worked harder than Cheney to ensure that war with Iraq would not be prevented at the last minute. It was important that Roosevelt attract the attention of the masses the "issues" and bring them home to the people, hence the endless press reports, the "newsreels" shown endlessly at cinemas and the endless brainwashing speeches of the politicians.
Propaganda has to be in a medium easily understood by the lowest level of intelligence among the nation, such as posters
depicting workers in munitions factories, shipyards; aircraft assembly plants all working on the "home front" for the "war
effort" and so on. In the aftermath of the WTC tragedy, much of that type of mass-brainwashing propaganda was revived:  "America at War", "the front line", "and munitions dumps", "enemy troop positions" appeared as sub headings on almost everything televisions screened. The fact that the United States was not at war because war had not been declared, and that there were no enemy "troops" other than loosely knit guerilla groups, was of course omitted. Dictionaries define troops as "a body of soldiers; an army, generally in the plural." The Taliban had no army, and therefore, no troops. Besides which, war could not be declared on "terrorism" or "Bolshevism" or any other "ism." War can only be declared against sovereign nations, this
according to the U.S. Constitution.

War can only be declared on a country or a particular nation of people inhabiting that country. Anything else is Tavistock
balderdash dished up on a platter decorated with waving flags and to the accompaniment of martial music. To say that that the United States is at war with the Taliban is the height of deception. To be at war of necessity demands a prior declaration of war. Without a declaration of war it is deception, in effect no war at all. A new dimension was added. President Bush, denied  armaking powers and law- making powers by the U.S. Constitution, was suddenly imbued with powers, which didn't exist in the U.S. Constitution.

For the Original Tavistock pdf, look below to download it to your device!

August 1st 2020 Rev - 1
Mark Aldrich,
Aug 2, 2020, 1:14 AM