Same Sex Marriage

Now that New York, the sixth state in the United States of America has legalized same sex marriage, I want to tell you what the bible says about it, and how God judges it!

First, God would in no way cause a person to be born who was naturally "gay." It just simply isn't going to happen. He knows us from our conception and HIS plans from the beginning of time have been to procreate and populate HIS earth. Two same sex people can not do that.

Then in 2015 the United States of America Under Barrack Insane Obama legalized Same Sex Marriage Nationwide

Same Sex Marriage in the United States
From Wikipedia:
Same-sex marriage in the United States expanded from one state in 2004 to all fifty states in 2015 through various state court rulings, state legislation, direct popular votes, and federal court rulings. Same-sex marriage is also referred to as gay marriage, while the political status in which the marriages of same-sex couples and the marriages of opposite-sex couples are recognized as equal by the law is referred to as marriage equality. The fifty states each have separate marriage laws, which must adhere to rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States that recognize marriage as a fundamental right that is guaranteed by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as first established in the 1967 landmark civil rights case of Loving v. Virginia.

Civil rights campaigning in support of marriage without distinction as to sex or sexual orientation began in the 1970s.[1] In 1972, the now overturned Baker v. Nelson saw the Supreme Court of the United States decline to become involved.[2] The issue became prominent from around 1993, when the Supreme Court of Hawaii ruled in Baehr v. Lewin that it was unconstitutional under the state constitution for the state to abridge marriage on the basis of sex. That ruling led to federal and state actions to explicitly abridge marriage on the basis of sex in order to prevent the marriages of same-sex couples from being recognized by law, the most prominent of which was the 1996 federal DOMA. In 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health that it was unconstitutional under the state constitution for the state to abridge marriage on the basis of sex. From 2004 through to 2015, as the tide of public opinion continued to move towards support of same-sex marriage, various state court rulings, state legislation, direct popular votes (referendums and initiatives), and federal court rulings established same-sex marriage in thirty-six of the fifty states.

The first two decades of the 21st century saw same-sex marriage receive support from prominent figures in the civil rights movement, including Coretta Scott King, John Lewis, Julian Bond, and Mildred Loving.[3] In May 2011, national public support for same-sex marriage rose above 50% for the first time.[4] In May 2012, the NAACP, the leading African-American civil rights organization, declared its support for same-sex marriage and stated that it is a civil right.[5] In June 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States struck down DOMA for violating the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution in the landmark civil rights case of United States v. Windsor, leading to federal recognition of same-sex marriage, with federal benefits for married couples connected to either the state of residence or the state in which the marriage was solemnized. In May 2015, national public support for same-sex marriage rose to 60% for the first time.[6] In June 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in the landmark civil rights case of Obergefell v. Hodges that the fundamental right of same-sex couples to marry on the same terms and conditions as opposite-sex couples, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities, is guaranteed by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The most prominent supporters of same-sex marriage are human rights and civil rights organizations as well as the medical and scientific communities, while the most prominent opponents are religious groups. The ruling of the Supreme Court in Obergefell occurred following decades of consistently rising national public support for same-sex marriage in the United States, with support continuing to rise thereafter.

A study of nationwide data from January 1999 to December 2015 revealed that the establishment of same-sex marriage is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of attempted suicide among children, with the effect being concentrated among children of a minority sexual orientation, resulting in approximately 134,000 fewer children attempting suicide each year in the United States. The United States is the most populous country in the world to have established same-sex marriage nationwide.


Romans 1:20-32 (King James Version)
20) For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead: so that they are without excuse; 21) Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
23) And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four footed beasts, and creeping things. 24) Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25) Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever, Amen. 26) For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections; for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature; 27) And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet. 28) And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave then over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29) Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30) Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31) Without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32) Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them

Did God create another man so that Adam would not be lonely? NO!

It is not unusual for anyone male or female to be curious about the opposite sex. It is not unusual to have feelings of different kinds for people of the same sex. It is not unusual for there to even be experimentation with the same sex in an intimate fashion, but the bottom line is, that experimentation in an intimate fashion is sinful and wrong.

Men with men, women with women can not produce offspring. It is morally wrong to be together in the same way a man and a woman would engage in intimate relations in the confines of marriage. It is morally wrong for a man and a woman to have intimate relations before marriage too, but that is not the issue here and now.

God as my witness, He made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

It is a sin to engage in same sex intimacy, same sex marriage, or any other perverse act.

Here is one of the problems with this behavior, and how each same sex person's attitude will bring them to sin. The devil has worked his mischief and caused the peoples minds to be lazy. Any same gender person will usually give in to another same gender of person for working abominable acts because they are horny and easy. They only want to please their bodies and not God. They will not use self discipline, but instead just want the feel good thrill of it all.

Now, I have to be real here as much as it is going to sound very bad. God did not create a man to stick his reproductive organ in another man's waste canal. This is totally unnatural. This can not produce off-spring. It is not a natural loving situation and is morally wrong. How can anyone, even do that and think it is good or right or moral? This is how and why certain diseases have entered into this realm of immorality.

In the same way, two women together using tools to please each other does not produce off-spring and in the same ways are morally, physically and intimately wrong. God did not make Eve first, nor did HE make an Eve for Eve.

A man and a woman, although there are some who are very loose by the worlds standards, will always be more decisive and picky with whom they will have intimate relations with! Because they are normally looking for a soul mate. Even though it is sin before there is marriage, it is at least, how God intended the intimate relations of men and women to be processed.

Anyone who engages in same sex sex, is giving into their need for attention and lustful feelings, also, after a while, they get so used to it, it does seem normal, and that's when they usually aren't bothered going public with it. As humans, we are conditioned by everything and the more you push the boundaries of sin, no matter what category or by what capacity it happens to fall into, it is nothing but submission to the devils works and leads to degradation of the human spirit and body, and eventually a complete reprobate condition.


Identical twin studies prove homosexuality is not genetic

By Mark Ellis

Dr. Neil Whitehead

Dr. Neil Whitehead

Eight major studies of identical twins in Australia, the U.S., and Scandinavia during the last two decades all arrive at the same conclusion: gays were not born that way.

“At best genetics is a minor factor,” says Dr. Neil Whitehead, PhD. Whitehead worked for the New Zealand government as a scientific researcher for 24 years, then spent four years working for the United Nations and International Atomic Energy Agency. Most recently, he serves as a consultant to Japanese universities about the effects of radiation exposure. His PhD is in biochemistry and statistics.


Identical twins have the same genes or DNA. They are nurtured in equal prenatal conditions.  If homosexuality is caused by genetics or prenatal conditions and one twin is gay, the co-twin should also be gay.

“Because they have identical DNA, it ought to be 100%,” Dr. Whitehead notes. But the studies reveal something else. “If an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women.”

Because identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality cannot be genetically dictated. “No-one is born gay,” he notes. “The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.”

Dr. Whitehead believes same-sex attraction (SSA) is caused by “non-shared factors,”  things happening to one twin but not the other, or a personal response to an event by one of the twins and not the other.

For example, one twin might have exposure to pornography or sexual abuse, but not the other.  One twin may interpret and respond to their family or classroom environment differently than the other. “These individual and idiosyncratic responses to random events and to common environmental factors predominate,” he says.

The first very large, reliable study of identical twins was conducted in Australia in 1991, followed by a large U.S. study about 1997. Then Australia and the U.S. conducted more twin studies in 2000, followed by several studies in Scandinavia, according to Dr. Whitehead.

“Twin registers are the foundation of modern twin studies. They are now very large, and exist in many countries. A gigantic European twin register with a projected 600,000 members is being organized, but one of the largest in use is in Australia, with more than 25,000 twins on the books.”

A significant twin study among adolescents shows an even weaker genetic correlation. In 2002 Bearman and Brueckner studied tens of thousands of adolescent students in the U.S.  The same-sex attraction concordance between identical twins was only 7.7% for males and 5.3% for females—lower than the 11% and 14% in the Australian study by Bailey et al conducted in 2000.

In the identical twin studies, Dr. Whitehead has been struck by how fluid and changeable sexual identity can be.

“Neutral academic surveys show there is substantial change. About half of the homosexual/bisexual population (in a non-therapeutic environment) moves towards heterosexuality over a lifetime. About 3% of the present heterosexual population once firmly believed themselves to be homosexual or bisexual.”

“Sexual orientation is not set in concrete,” he notes.

Even more remarkable, most of the changes occur without counseling or therapy. “These changes are not therapeutically induced, but happen ‘naturally’ in life, some very quickly,” Dr. Whitehead observes. “Most changes in sexual orientation are towards exclusive heterosexuality.”

Numbers of people who have changed towards exclusive heterosexuality are greater than current numbers of bisexuals and homosexuals combined. In other words, ex-gays outnumber actual gays.

The fluidity is even more pronounced among adolescents, as Bearman and Brueckner’s study demonstrated. “They found that from 16 to 17-years-old, if a person had a romantic attraction to the same sex, almost all had switched one year later.”

“The authors were pro-gay and they commented that the only stability was among the heterosexuals, who stayed the same year after year. Adolescents are a special case—generally changing their attractions from year to year.”

Still, many misconceptions persist in the popular culture. Namely, that homosexuality is genetic – so hard-wired into one’s identity that it can’t be changed. “The academics who work in the field are not happy with the portrayals by the media on the subject,” Dr. Whitehead notes. “But they prefer to stick with their academic research and not get involved in the activist side.”


New Twin Study: People Not Born Gay

The argument is simple enough. If a person is born a certain way, who are we to judge what they are? A person born with black skin is that way because of his or her genes. We’ve been told that homosexuality is gene-directed. A person’s DNA determines sexual attraction and identity even though the sexual organs in same-sex relationships do not line up with the genetic makeup of people of the same sex.

One would think that sexual normalcy would coincide with sexual reproduction. It’s a rational and scientific judgment to make. Homosexuality stops the transfer of DNA to a new generation. One would think that science alone would be enough to conclude that same-sex sex is genetically counterproductive.

One way to test a hypothesis is to find similar test subjects. Twin studies have frequently been used to test genetic theories. The latest twin studies regarding homosexuality are giving more evidence that homosexuality is not DNA determined.

“Eight major studies of identical twins in Australia, the U.S., and Scandinavia during the last two decades all arrive at the same conclusion: gays were not born that way. . . .

“Identical twins have the same genes or DNA. They are nurtured in equal prenatal conditions.  If homosexuality is caused by genetics or prenatal conditions and one twin is gay, the co-twin should also be gay.

“‘Because they have identical DNA, it ought to be 100%,’ Dr. [Neil] Whitehead notes. But the studies reveal something else. ‘If an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women.’

“Because identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality cannot be genetically dictated. ‘No-one is born gay,’ he notes. ‘The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.’”

I know two sets of twins where this is true. Of course, my sample is very small, but it is an indication that DNA is not the predominate factor in the sexual choices people make.

But let’s assume that DNA does determine sexual preference. What if a case could be made that DNA determines if a person has sexual desires for children? Would this then mean that the ensuing behavior would have to be legitimized by state legislatures and anti-discrimination laws would be put in place?

Where do we stop with DNA-determined behavior? Why are some DNA-determined behaviors good and others bad? Consider the following and ask yourself this question: Why are scientists working to overcome these genetic irregularities but not homosexuality which is genetically counter productive?:

  • “Scientists say they have found a gene that predicts whether prostate cancer will develop into its most lethal form.”
  • “A research team at two Mideast universities has developed a new way to genetically alter cells in living mice; offering new possibilities in the war against cancer and other diseases.”
  • “Some of us, it seems, were just born to be bad. Scientists say they are on the verge of pinning down genetic and biochemical abnormalities that predispose their bearers to violence. An article in the journal Science . . . carried the headline EVIDENCE FOUND FOR POSSIBLE ‘AGGRESSION’ GENE.”[1]
  • “Apparently healthy men with normal weight and cholesterol levels are at three times higher risk of a heart attack if they have a common variation of a particular gene, researchers say.”[2]
  • “Salk Institute scientists say they have uncovered a gene that triggers certain forms of Leukemia, a discovery that may lead to the development of a screening test within the next few months.”[3]
  • “Researchers have found a brain chemical that boosts the craving for fat—and a way to block it without affecting the appetite for healthier foods.”[4]
  • “Why do gamblers often bet more after a losing hand? Or investors throw good money after bad? The answer may lie in the science of the brain.”[5]
  • “Is racism simply human nature or something learned from society? Neither, says a team of psychologists who, despite criticism, argue that racism represents an accidental side effect of evolution.”[6]

So even if genetics is the determining factor among people who engage in same-sex sex, this would not mean that the behavior is either genetically normal or a candidate for special legal protection.

Read more:


GOP Now Sees Gay Marriage as 'Inevitable' as Democrats Do

June 7, 2013 RSS Feed Print
(Jim Mone/AP)

Liz Oppenheimer, left, smiles as she and partner Jeanne Burns apply for their marriage license on June 6, 2013, in Minneapolis.

An overwhelming majority – 72 percent (that's a propaganda lie)– of Americans now believe same-sex marriage is "inevitable," according to a new Pew Research Center survey, with Republicans seeing gay marriage legalization as likely to happen as their Democratic and independent counterparts do.

Republicans see legal recognition of gay marriage as unavoidable, but that doesn't mean they like it. Only 31 percent of Republicans polled support same-sex marriage, compared to 59 percent of Democrats and 58 percent of independents, the survey found. And far more Republicans (78 percent) said they would be "upset" to find out their child was gay or lesbian than Democrats (53 percent). Those who identified as Republican were also far less likely to have "a lot" of gay friends than Democrats or independents.

White evangelicals supported gay marriage the least of any demographic, though they, too, (another propaganda bold face lie) overwhelmingly saw the legalization of gay marriage as inevitable, at 70 percent. Respondents in the "unaffiliated" religious group favored gay marriage most. (yes, unaffiliated with God!)

[BROWSE: Cartoons on Same-Sex Marriage]

The poll was released as the Supreme Court prepares to hand down two rulings on gay-marriage – one on same-sex marriage in California, another on federal benefits tied to a person's marital status.

Same-sex marriage is legal in 12 states and in the District of Columbia. And the USA is under judgement just like Sodom & Gomorrah. Any nation who falls away from God's commandments and promotes immorality will suffer great under the hand of God!


My hope for you is that you have had a prayer 
of salvation, and if you haven't and you 
want to ask Christ into your heart and life, 
then I offer these words for you to repeat,
but only if your heart is sincere, 
because God knows it if you're not.

Dear God, I now know I have needed you and have
rejected your calling, so today, right now, 
I ask Jesus Christ to come into my heart 
and my life, and forgive me from all past sin 
and Lord cleanse me from my unrighteousness. 
I believe that Jesus was crucified for my sin, died, 
and was buried according to the scriptures. 
I want you forever more to be my guide 
and I want to follow you as a believer. 
I ask for your strength to change my heart 
and my earthly ways so that I can become 
a better child in your kingdom. 
Show me how to depend on you in all things. 
And show me how to do your will in my life. 
I thank you and pray this prayer 
in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen!

July 5th, 2011 - 27 rev.