Vaccines"The Real Truth" II

Dr. Fleming Calls COVID a ‘Crime Against Humanity’

By Judith Robinson

In his 135-paged book, “Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation,” Richard M. Fleming decodes the genetic sequence of COVID-19. The nuclear cardiologist, lawyer and medical researcher has discovered in this sequence many, if not all, of the components of what he calls “a biological weapon.” He writes:

“SARS-CoV-1 was a genetically modified (Gain-of-Function) virus that was also a bioweapon developed by the Chinese Communist Party, with SARS-CoV-2 being the upgraded version of this bioweapon.” 

The doctor determined this was the case mainly based on interviews he conducted with Dr. Li-Meng Yan —  one of which is transcribed in the book — a Chinese medical doctor and virologist who escaped to the United States in 2020. Fleming states Yan asserted that “SARS-CoV-1 was the first bioweapon and that SARS-CoV-2 is the advanced version.” Yan contends that the Chinese military knew about the development of artificial viruses, as potential bioweapons, as revealed in the book. She is still in hiding in fear for her life. 

In colorful charts and graphs, Fleming explains, in layman’s terms, each component in the SARS-CoV-2 sequence, detailing how each was likely added to the mix to create a monster out of existing viruses, in a Wuhan lab. The genetic sequencing alone would make this book well worth purchasing.

But Fleming goes beyond just presenting the formula for the COVID bioweapon. He provides a paper trail pointing the finger at the likely suspects who funded this criminal experiment, which he identifies as “Gain-of-Function research.” In gain-of-function research, scientists and technicians enhance the lethal capability of viruses in order to “better understand how something like a corona virus might mutate over time.” He states: 

“Such mutations might allow scientists and physicians to stay ahead of such infections … Instead of asking questions about what might happen naturally, this research became one of intentionally making those changes occur not in small incremental steps as might occur naturally, but in larger steps that would most likely take centuries to occur — if at all.” 

Fleming reports President Obama banned gain-of-function from American labs in October of 2014 after workers were exposed to anthrax. 

Yet it reemerged several years later in China. Was it secretly funded by American organizations in China while it was banned in the U.S.? 

From 2018, the doctor highlights documents proving that gain-of-function research with bats was being conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, funded by American donors. 

Fleming includes the dollar amounts American organizations contributed to this so-called research. Millions came from agencies connected to the U.S. government including the Department of Defense. He asks:

“What new pandemic now awaits humanity given this Gain-of-Function funding by the U.S. federal government — and other governments, corporations, and individuals — including SARS-CoV-2, viruses, bacteria and biologic pathogenic agents?” 

Fleming is also sounding the alarm about the efficacy and safety of COVID vaccines. Because he sees COVID as a lab-created bioweapon, he writes, “there are no real effective vaccines against the pandemic.” 

Fleming also states that most masks, in nearly all circumstances, are ineffective at preventing the transmission of COVID. 

He states that the “evidence is not there … None of it supports the wearing of masks by kids in secondary school systems. None of it supports … the wearing of it in the general population … the spread is so minimal.” In a hospital setting, the right kind of mask may provide some benefits, he adds. 

Fleming warns about the danger of turning “the practice of medicine and honest scientific investigation over to the government” as happened under the administration of Adolf Hitler. He writes:

“Many people over the years have decided what was best for humanity. Bill Gates has commented on more than one occasion that the use of clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats technology would make it possible to ‘eliminate undesirable genes’ and ‘potentially swap in preferable alternatives’ – a concept held by other in history, including Dr. Joseph Mengele.” 

Fleming cites that under Hitler, doctors became “biological soldiers” committed to “cleansing” the population of “inferior” genetic material. 

The doctor states that those responsible for funding and unleashing the COVID bioweapon are guilty of “crimes against humanity.” He calls for “criminal accountability” for those who caused “this devastation, destruction and death across the planet.”

This incredibly well-documented, concise and passionate book is a must-read in order to understand what is really at stake in the COVID pandemic.


“Breakthrough Cases”

August 2, 2021 The Shipp Brief  

Senator Lindsey Graham, who has received both COVD vaccines, has just been re-infected with COVID 19.

Instead of reinfection they are calling these, “Breakthrough cases,” the usual deceptive use of words.
Studies from the UK are showing many reinfections.

The Deep State CDC and its mouthpieces are adding the phrase, “But it’s a good thing they were vaccinated or the symptoms could have been much worse.”

The biggest lie of all? THE COVID SHOT IS NOT A VACCINE. It is gene therapy, in Big Pharma’s words, “Downloading Code” into your DNA. People do not get sick again from a legitimate vaccine.

This ignores the fact that 96%+ of people who get COVID recover and there are immediate treatments that work, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.

It now appears that vaccinated people can be super spreaders to unvaccinated people. Can this get any more bizarre?

Now some talking heads are saying COVID could be around for 15 years, meaning lockdowns, masks and mandatory (door-to-door?) vaccines.

I encourage you to thoroughly examine both sides of the equation and reach an educated decision.

I am not anti-VACCINE. But this issue just gets worse and worse as the days pass.

The crisis is not just the virus. It is also what governments are doing with it, and known treatments are being concealed.


Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

YouTube Video


There was an unexpected 40% increase in 'all cause deaths' in 2021

Feb 3, 2022

YouTube Video


Pfizer’s Covid Vaccine Protection Against Omicron Fades Just Weeks After Second And Third Doses, Study Finds

Robert Hart
Forbes Staff
Updated May 16, 2022, 04:13am EDT

Immunity against the omicron coronavirus variant fades rapidly after a second and third dose of Pfizer and BioNTech’s Covid-19 vaccine, according to peer reviewed research published in JAMA Network Open on Friday, a finding that could support rolling out additional booster shots to vulnerable people as the variant drives an uptick in new cases across the country.

Key Facts

Levels of omicron-specific “neutralizing” antibodies—which can target the virus and stop it from replicating—decline rapidly after a second and third dose of Pfizer’s shot, according to the Danish study of 128 people who had received two or three doses.

Antibody levels, which are associated with protection against infection and disease, fell within weeks of getting the shots and were much lower than the level of antibodies specific to the original and delta coronavirus variants, the researchers said.

Compared to original and delta variants, the proportion of omicron-specific antibodies detected in participants’ blood dropped “rapidly” from 76% four weeks after the second shot to 53% at weeks eight to 10 and 19% at weeks 12 to 14, the researchers found.

Omicron-specific antibody levels increased after the third dose—nearly 21-fold at week three and nearly 8-fold at week four, compared to four weeks after the second dose—and the shot generated a detectable response in most people for at least eight weeks, the researchers said.

However, antibody levels started to drop as early as three weeks after the booster shot, falling 4.9-fold for the original variant, 5.6-fold for delta and 5.4-fold for omicron between weeks three and eight.

The “transient” antibody response after doses two and three mean additional booster shots might be needed to combat the variant, particularly among older people, the researchers said.

Key Background

Experts and regulators broadly acknowledge the benefits of a third vaccine dose to top up flagging protection against serious illness and death. There is less consensus over whether additional shots are needed beyond that and questions over whether frequent boosting will be practical. Neutralizing antibodies have been the primary focus of studies evaluating vaccines—they are much easier to study—but they are not the only part of the immune system protecting humans against disease. Other parts of the immune system, such as T cells, might be less effective at preventing infection but they are more durable than antibodies and can reduce the chance of serious illness if infected. Many experts believe this latter property is the primary function of vaccination, not preventing infection, and data shows they offer much more durable protection, including against omicron.

Further Reading

We Cannot ‘Boost Our Way Out’ Of The Covid Pandemic, Experts Warn (Forbes)

Do You Need A Second Covid Booster Shot? Experts Are Divided. (Forbes)

Below when Gates say:

Bill Gates

Says there will be another pandemic while expressing hope for an 'eradication vaccine'....

What he means is ("hope for a depopulation vaccine!")


Bill Gates speaks during a panel discussion at the 2022 Munich Security Conference in Germany on Feb. 18, 2022. (Alexandra Beier/Getty Images)

Omicron Is ‘Type of Vaccine’ That Gives Cellular Immunity, Spreads Faster Than Vaccines: Bill Gates

Bill Gates

Says there will be another pandemic while expressing hope for an 'eradication vaccine'

Says there will be another pandemic while expressing hope for an 'eradication vaccine'

By Mimi Nguyen Ly
February 19, 2022 Updated: February 20, 2022

Billionaire Bill Gates says the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has spread faster across the world than the COVID-19 vaccines have, and that the variant is a “type of vaccine” that gives people cellular immunity. He also predicted on Feb. 18 that another pandemic was coming, and shared what he believes should be done “next time.”

At the 2022 Munich Security Conference, attended by security experts, politicians, and people of influence around the world, the Microsoft co-founder was asked: “Where would you assess where we are today in beating COVID-19?”

“Well, sadly, the virus itself, particularly the variant called Omicron, is the type of vaccine—that is, it creates both B cell and T cell immunity—and it’s done a better job of getting out to the world population than we have with vaccines,” Gates said.

B cell and T cell immunity, also referred to as cellular immunity, comprise alternate mechanisms of immunity than antibodies. A study published in Nature suggests that the immune system’s T cells may offer protection against COVID-19 by “remembering past encounters with other human coronaviruses.”

bill gates Co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Bill Gates (C) speaks with Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly (R) and Swedish Foreign Minister Ann Linde during the 58th Munich Security Conference in Munich, on Feb. 18, 2022. (Thomas Kienzle/AFP via Getty Images)

Meanwhile, a study published in the medical journal Cell (pdf) said that data suggests “SARS-CoV-2 elicits broadly directed and functionally replete memory T cell responses, suggesting that natural exposure or infection may prevent recurrent episodes of severe COVID-19.”

Gates told the conference that the risk of severe disease from contracting COVID-19 has been dramatically reduced due to people having been exposed to various variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

“If you do serosurveys in African countries, you get well over 80 percent of people [who] have been exposed either to the vaccine or to various variants. And so what that does is it means the chance of severe disease—which is mainly associated with being elderly and having obesity or diabetes—those risks are now dramatically reduced because of that infection exposure,” he said.

The Omicron variant, since its identification in November 2021, has spread rapidly across the world to become the most dominant variant, although it generally triggers much milder symptoms.

Gates, who has invested in vaccine research via the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, noted in regard to vaccines that “it took us two years to be an oversupply.”

“Today, there are more [COVID-19] vaccines than there’s demand for vaccines,” he said. “It’s sad we didn’t do a great job on therapeutics. Only here, two years in, do we have a good therapeutic.”

He also said that vaccine development “took us a lot longer this time than it should have,” and suggested that “next time, instead of two years, we should make it more like six months.”

“Certainly, some of the standardized platform approaches, including mRNA, would allow us to do that,” Gates said.

‘We’ll Have Another Pandemic’

When asked about the potential for another pandemic, he responded, “Well, we’ll have another pandemic; it will be a different pathogen next time.”

Gates said there will also be “some rebound” with the current pathogen, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, at more typical seasonal flu levels.

“We don’t have a tool to do eradication,” he said, noting that current COVID-19 vaccines haven’t been able to prevent inoculated individuals from getting infected.

Gates said that funding should be allotted to developing a vaccine that can “get rid of families of respiratory viruses, including the flu family, and the coronavirus family.”

“And I do think in the next decade we can come up with an eradication vaccine,” he said. “That’s an aspiration, not a guarantee. … There’s already a lot of work that’s been done on a universal flu vaccine, and the date on that looks very promising.”

“We won’t get death levels at the kind of acute level that we’re still experiencing today as the Omicron wave passes through on a global basis,” Gates said.

Gates’s Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation on Jan. 19 pledged $300 million to the UK’s Wellcome Trust to support the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).

The coalition was formed five years ago by the governments of Norway, Germany, Japan, and India, as well as the Gates Foundation, Wellcome, and the World Economic Forum. It has co-led a global initiative called COVAX to deliver vaccines to low- and middle-income countries.

CEPI said it’s seeking to raise $3.5 billion to “develop lifesaving vaccines against any new viral threat (referred to as ‘Disease X’)—to within 100 days of a pathogen being sequenced.”


Pfizer, AstraZeneca vaccine antibody levels may decline after 2-3 months: Lancet study


The Most Terrifying Warning Yet on COVID Shots

World-renowned microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi warns that COVID “vaccines” will produce global catastrophe and decimate the population.

In this exclusive interview with The New American magazine’s Senior Editor Alex Newman, internationally renowned German-Thai-American microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi warns that the COVID hysteria is based on lies.

Even more alarming is his assertion that the COVID “vaccines” are set to cause a world-wide cataclysm of unprecedented proportions, including mass death among those who take them.

Starting off, Dr. Bhakdi, the retired chief of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the University of Mainz, explains that the PCR used to “diagnose” COVID cases has been abused to produce fear in a way that is unscientific.

Next, he explains what the mRNA vaccines are going to do to the human body using analogies and language that anyone can understand.

Among other concerns, he expects massive death due to deadly clotting as well as immune system responses that will destroy the human body.

Finally, Bhakdi, who warned of impending “doom” during a Fox News interview that went viral, calls for criminal prosecutions of the people responsible, as well as an immediate halt to this global experiment.

Watch and share to get this important warning to all Americans before it’s too late.

Liberty Sentinel Staff


World-Renowned Microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi Has Urgent Warning of COVID-19 Vaccine Risks

by daniel_g

Thai-German microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi continues to expose Big Pharma and the dangers of their poison vaccines they’re pushing to the public.

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is already on the market in America and the United Kingdom.

And there’s already cause for concern due to side effects expressed in numerous recipients:

2 Alaska Health Workers Got Emergency Treatment After Receiving Pfizer’s Vaccine.

— Antiqua N. Smart, DNP, NP-BC, PHNA-BC✝️ ⚕️ (@AskMeDrSmartDNP) December 19, 2020

New: severe allergic reaction to Pfizer vaccine in an Alaskan HCW without a prior history of allergy, received epinephrine X 2, now well. Different cf 3 UK individuals with prior allergic history. We should anticipate rare, unexpected side effects.
Real world ≠ Clinical trials — Eric Topol (@EricTopol) December 16, 2020

Tennessee hospital nurse reportedly faints shortly after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine — WION (@WIONews) December 18, 2020

America can add the Moderna vaccine to the list. A Bill Gates favorite.
FedEx begins first shipments of Moderna vaccine from Memphis after FDA approval

— Commercial Appeal (@memphisnews) December 20, 2020

March 2016 – "The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has announced an initial $20-million grant to Moderna to advance the development of an affordable mRNA-based cocktail of antibody therapeutics."

— Tren Griffin (@trengriffin) May 18, 2020

Bhakdi raises serious red flags about the safety of these vaccines. But his warnings are suppressed by the mainstream media. Check out some footage from the famous doctor: Discuss it for God sake before injecting people…

Prominent Virologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi Exposes 'Major Risks' of Gene-Altering Vaccine Released in America & UK

The Famous Doctor outlines the 4 terrifying consequences "Before it's too Late"

— Zaid Hamid (@ZaidZamanHamid) December 19, 2020

Breaking news a book called "CORONA FALSE ALARM facts and figures" By Dr. Karina Reiss and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi (Retired Microbiologist). It says #vaccines is so so unnecessary and it is dangerous if you follow the lines. And you're going to your DOOM.

Bhakdi also comments that the rushed nature of the COVID vaccine is the biggest medical experiment in human history.
Award-winning virologist, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi elucidates why the rushed #Covid19 vaccine trials represent the world’s largest medical experiment perpetrated on the globe in human history. #PathogenicPriming#KillerLymphocytes

— Loves Truth & Art #FreeSpeech (@AssocDesign) December 18, 2020

RAIR Foundation listed the four major risks expressed by Bhakdi: 

1.) Elderly Citizens are at Risk!

The first striking observation made by Dr. Bhakdi was that the vaccine, “developed in partnership with US pharma giant Pfizer” was not tested on individuals that are most likely to die of the coronavirus: elderly people with pre-existing conditions. In fact, Dr. Bhakdi specifically points out that the test subjects were “young, healthy people”. Still, “half of them had fever, chills, muscle aches, aching limbs, headaches, and they felt sick,” said the doctor.

The narrator, Austrian journalist Michael Fleischhacker asked incredulously, “[S]o there weren’t enough test subjects with similar conditions to those who are receiving the vaccination now?” “None,” Dr. Bhakdi responded. “None of test subjects had pre-existing conditions,” he continued.

It does not take a rocket scientist to consider the extreme danger of administering a hastily-created, gene-altering vaccine to a health-compromised population, when there were marked side effects for “young, healthy people”. Still, “[P]riority will given to seniors in care homes, Berlin city government announced,” reports Deutsche Welle (DW).

2.) The Danger of a Gene-Altering Vaccine (mRNA)

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi explains that the second “major risk” is the fact that the gene-altering Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination “can cause very serious allergic reactions.” The mRNA is described at the CDC as “a new type of vaccine to protect against infectious diseases,” and Bhakdi has warned that this type of vaccine is “still unknown scientifically and medically.”

Back in September, RAIR Foundation quoted the doctor as saying that the coronavirus vaccine in development “isn’t a normal conventional vaccine, and it’s not like the flu vaccine.” He observed the irony that while many people are against “genetically modified food,” a vaccination “that genetically manipulates the human body” does not appear to garner concern.

The flu shot is known for putting a “weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies” in order to help build a body’s natural immunity to the virus. This is not the case with a mRNA vaccine, which uses existing cells to create a protein “found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19” that triggers an immune response, according to the CDC.

The immune response in turn “produces antibodies” that protect against the virus. While there are “no licensed mRNA vaccines in the United States,” the CDC assures Americans that “researchers have been studying and working with them for decades…”

3.) Coronavirus Vaccine Can Cause ‘an Explosive Immune Overreaction’

The third risk from the coronavirus vaccine, Dr. Bhakdi explains, is that it can “contribute an adverse overreaction to subsequent naturally occurring infections.” Bhakdi continues to say that the potential overreaction can also affect “other viruses” as well.

Bhakdi states: “…strangely enough, this vaccine can contribute an adverse overreaction to subsequent
naturally occurring infections. And not just with this virus, also with other viruses, such as a
flu virus. It causes an explosive immune overreaction.”

The Virologist stated that tests on animals “showed that there was amplification of the immune system reaction to the disease.” He continues: “The animals that were vaccinated nearly died. This is an immense danger.”

Dr. Bhakdi explains that “Once a gene-based vaccination is injected in your arm, within minutes the vaccine (mRNA) spreads throughout your body.”

4.) Risk of Autoimmune Disease

Dr. Bhakdi’s fourth “major risk” is the possiblity of autoimmune disease, which he also explains in detail here. The doctor explains that an “offshoot” of autoimmune disease is “actually embolismic disturbance which can cause death, theoretically, and female infertility.”

Without hesitation, Dr. Backdi continues: “These are theoretical things that are already written in black and white.”

Earlier this month, RAIR Foundation USA reported that the head of the Robert Koch Institute, Germany’s equivalent of America’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), appeared to be preparing citizens for inevitable deaths that will take place following the administration of the vaccine. Prof. Lothar H. Wieler assured citizens that “on average 2,500 – 2,700 people die in Germany each day” and therefore, deaths that people may want to attribute to the coronavirus vaccine could be due to “another pre-existing disease” as they will be administered to the “elderly and extremely elderly.”

The irony, of course, is that while the German government prepares citizens for inevitable deaths from the coronavirus vaccine, the actual mortality rate of the virus is difficult to find. “You won’t be able to find the answer [actual mortality rate], because you’ll only get an answer if you search the reports from the RKI [Robert Koch Institute] and calculate the number yourself,” Dr. Bhakti previously observed.


Fauci Spills The Beans: A Vaccine Won’t End COVID-19 Restrictions

Anthony Fauci is always the harbinger of additional suffering to be inflicted by state and local governments. Count on governors parroting the new expectation.
Georgi Boorman
September 14, 2020

Dr. Anthony Fauci just spilled the beans: contrary to the implicit promise numerous politicians made that COVID-19 restrictions would only last “until there’s an effective vaccine,” Fauci says the arrival of a vaccine won’t mean life will return to normal, perhaps for more than a year.

“If you’re talking about getting back to a degree of normality which resembles where we were prior to COVID, it’s going to be well into 2021, maybe even towards the end of 2021,” said the director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases on Friday.

A safe and effective vaccine produced this quickly would be a stunning scientific accomplishment that could save thousands of lives. But Fauci warned that widespread distribution and getting “the majority, or more, of the population vaccinated and protected” won’t happen until perhaps the end 2021, and therefore means we cannot be free from oppressive lockdown measures until at least that point.

Aside from Fauci being a reliable harbinger for politicians moving the COVID-19 goal posts, we have three very good reasons to doubt the understanding promoted by politicians so far about returning to normal when a vaccine is deployed: 1) politicians already moved the goalposts far away from “flatten the curve” and “15 days to slow the spread” and thus can’t be trusted 2) they’ve ignored their promise of reopening if effective treatments were found, and 3) the newly discovered phenomenon of COVID-19 reinfection gives panic-pushers an excuse to keep lockdown measures until some new target of vaccine efficacy or compliance is met.

In short, we have every reason to believe Fauci might even be understating the persistence of lockdown measures and almost no reason to believe previous political promises.

As I’ve written before, the slide from “flattening the curve” to make sure hospitals weren’t overwhelmed to goals as ambitious as “stopping the spread” happened about as fast as the decline in bad news about COVID-19 this spring. With nary an explanation as to why meeting the first goal wasn’t good enough to reopen American life as they had promised, politicians and journalists gaslit the public into accepting months of lockdowns.

No one this disingenuous can be trusted, which brings us to point number two: some governors have implied relief from lockdowns upon getting “effective treatment” as recently as this month. According to the Desert Sun, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in late August that the coronavirus “isn’t going away any time soon,” and that Californians need to “‘live with this fundamental truth until there is a vaccine’ or therapeutics help manage the spread of the virus” (emphasis added).

Similarly, the August 20 version of Washington’s Safe Start Reopening plan says, “Until there is an effective vaccine, effective treatment or herd immunity, it is crucial to maintain some level of community interventions to suppress the spread of COVID-19” (emphasis added). Oregon Gov. Kate Brown said on September 1 that Oregon can’t return to normal “until we reach the day that there is an effective vaccine or treatment for this disease” (emphasis added).

Except we already have cheap, safe, effective therapeutics to help manage the spread of the virus that have been shown to clear the viral load in mild to moderate COVID-19 cases in about a week. Both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have been in use for more than half a century and have favorable safety profiles (extremely high dosages notwithstanding).

Numerous studies of hydroxychloroquine, sometimes in combination with azithromycin, show significant reduction in mortality. Ivermectin is newer to the COVID-19 treatment scene, but research so far indicates an impressive level of efficacy in eliminating the virus. If we’re “at war” with COVID-19 and if shortening the contagious period is so important, as Newsom claims, then there’s no reason not to encourage widespread use of these treatments by doctors.

Yet the West Coast governors haven’t even tied a promise of reopening to confirmation of efficacy with these or any other drug currently being evaluated for COVID-19, something it makes perfect sense to do if they were serious about reopening with an effective treatment.

So should residents of these states trust their governors’ implicit promise they can return to normal when there’s an “effective” vaccine? And just how effective must it be to trigger a return to normal? Government officials have conveniently refused to determine metrics for that, leaving open the opportunity to move the goalposts yet again.

More importantly, now that we know reinfection with other strains of SARS-CoV-2 may be possible (albeit mild in effect, so far as we know), politicians can now say the rules of the game have changed, if and when it suits their agenda. While governors who imposed harsh pandemic restrictions, like Inslee, Cuomo, and Murphy, have been quiet so far on what reinfection means for policy, it will be easy for them to spin mild and asymptomatic reinfection as a cause for alarm, particularly if their case counts begin trending upwards again.

Rather than pushing politicians to lift social distancing and mask restrictions, as Forbes Policy Editor Avik Roy hopes the nature of the reinfections will do (since a COVID-19 vaccine will likely have very limited efficacy, as with the flu), governors and public health officials could argue the asymptomatic and mild cases of reinfection are all the more reason to “lock down again,” since we may experience a wave of reinfections before a vaccine has been widely administered.

Given that asymptomatic individuals have been made into the “superspreader” bogeymen of the pandemic, they can be touted as an additional reason to make everyone who appears healthy, including people who’ve already had the disease, continue distancing and wearing masks in perpetuity.

Furthermore, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has said it would only greenlight vaccines for deployment that have more than a 50 percent efficacy rate. If none of the vaccine candidates meet that standard, governors could inflict a range of social distancing policies until there is one, perhaps years down the road.

The goalposts are moving yet again. Contrary to Roy’s conclusion that ineffective vaccines will rob non-pharmaceutical interventions of their political and public health experience, it’s likely vaccination rates will become the new target for governors. Even if the FDA lowers the bar and accepts 30 percent efficacy as good enough for deployment (a rate we sometimes see with the seasonal flu vaccine), governors who think we can’t go back to normal until the virus is “stopped” will put even more pressure on getting as much of their state vaccinated as possible.

Even before Fauci’s pronouncement that we needed to get at least a majority of Americans vaccinated, signs were emerging that the goalposts would move to vaccination rates. Before the first confirmed reinfection case even came to light, Virginia Health Commissioner Dr. Norman Oliver said he plans to mandate the yet-to-be-released COVID-19 vaccine for all Virginians, with no exceptions except for medical reasons.

Experience thus far tells us we should expect that if significant portions of the public are reticent to take the COVID-19 vaccine, many governors will attempt to institute a universal mandate, and keep lockdown measures until everyone is vaccinated. It isn’t hard to envision at least several states enacting travel restrictions and bans on school entry for those who refuse the coronavirus vaccine, even though the disease is almost never deadly to those under the age of 45.

If Joe Biden wins the presidency, we could see a federal attempt to mandate the vaccine. The Democratic nominee has already voiced his support for “nationwide mask mandates” and willingness to “do whatever it takes” and “shut [the country] down” if some experts tell him he should. A vaccine mandate would solidify mass compliance as the condition for returning to normal.

Keeping COVID-19 restrictions “until there’s a vaccine” was always an empty promise, meant to keep the public submissive for a few more months. If the deployment of an effective vaccine doesn’t end COVID-19 restrictions, you know there is no lie pro-lockdown government officials won’t sell us to hold onto their power. Voters would do well to take this into account when casting ballots this November. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There's an agenda put out by globalist Bill Gates that pushes for mandatory vaccines for the world. The problem is, vaccines are a very risky endeavor for any child anywhere they live. If you don't believe me, just read further!


April 23 at 10:45 AM
Obviously it's not hard to get two bodies dead from asphyxiation loaded onto a canoe and then tip the canoe over in deep water, but the BIG mystery is how both bodies sank to the bottom when dead women float breast up. So obviously Robert is pissed, and he is now letting it all out. See these quotes from Robert with regard to Bill Gates:

This was all said on April 8 2020: Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft's ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy - the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism. Gates' obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of "lesser humans."

Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India's National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496, 000 children between 2000 and 2017.

In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates' vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates' Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates' vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates' vaccines.

In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23, 000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1, 200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country's Supreme Court. In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK's experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1, 048 of the 5, 049 children.

During Gates' 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates' operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50 and 500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, "We are guinea pigs for the drug makers." Nelson Mandela's former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates' philanthropic practices as "ruthless and immoral."
In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later, Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines "could reduce population". In 2014, Kenya's Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony "tetanus" vaccine campaign. Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. 

A 2017 study (Morgensen et. Al. 2017) showed that WHO's popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffer 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children. Gates and WHO have refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually. Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of hijacking WHO's agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish-that good health only comes in a syringe.

In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical-industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates' power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance. In his recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.



pranavsinha (34)in #life • 3 years ago

Yes, the Microsoft founder and the icon of the Third-World Humanitarianism has been kicked out of India as his fraud was called out. He came to India posing as a philanthropist and humanitarian helping the Third-World poor people by alleviating their conditions and yes, of course, “VACCINATING” their children.

But, only a couple of years earlier suspicions started to emerge. As, reports of their themselves being heavily invested in the companies which were manufacturing those vaccines started to appear. Native Indian doctors and health activists started raising objections as the illegality of the testing of those vaccines on poor children started to come out into the open. Suspicions arose that he may have committed a crime against humanity by illegally testing vaccines on poor innocent children. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation had been facing trials in the Supreme Court of India since then and a couple of months earlier they were kicked out of this country. So that, they could no longer kill innocent poor Indian children by illegal vaccine testing.

Back in 2009, the Gates Foundation funded the trial of Gardasil (Merck and co.) on nearly sixteen thousand poor and vulnerable tribal school children of the state of Andhra Pradesh in India. Many among those children fell terribly ill and at least five among them died. At around the same time they conducted the trial of Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline) on some fourteen thousand tribal children in Vadodara a place in Gujarat, another state of India. Because of this hundreds of those children fell terribly sick and at least two among them died. Upon investigation it was found that in both cases consent forms were forged. As many of those consent forms only had thumb impressions, many among them were singed by the wardens, who were bought, of the hostels those children were staying in. Many illiterate and poor parents were coerced into signing it too. And the children themselves had no clue about the nature of the disease and the vaccines.

Sana Ansari, 19, her brother Mazhar and sister Asiya were all enrolled in the trial of Gardasil 9 drug - but she and her family say she had no idea she was testing the drug.

A petition which condemned these atrocities as “ crimes against humanity” has claimed that the Gates Foundation, the WHO and the Programme for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH), both of which supported these trials, were criminally negligent for testing these deadly vaccines on the most vulnerable, poor, uneducated and massively under-informed people in India. They were not made aware of the potential dangers involved in those trials.

Aman Dhawan, 16, from Indore, lost weight and strength after being enrolled in the Gardasil 9 trial, which he didn't know he had signed up for either.

When all this was coming out into the open an attempt to cover this all up was also made with the help of bought up Indian health officials. But, eventually Gates Foundation was brought under trial in the Supreme Court of India. A couple of months ago it was kicked out this country. People of India will no longer be the victims of these Nazi-like experiments. It is time these big pharmaceutical companies realized that India is no longer going to allow them to treat vulnerable sections of India as guinea pigs because they can’t do that in their own countries.

Whistleblower Dr Anand Rai (pictured), 37, lifted the lid on the scandal of illegal drugs trials in the city and now has been given an armed guard to protect him.

And, I am damn sure that the Western mainstream media was not at all talking about it. I am from one those States of India to which the Gates Foundation came. Time and again it has been proved that in India majority of health related issues are because of hygiene related issues like poor sanitation or poor drinking water and things like that. And, not because of the lack of being vaccinated so that big pharmaceutical companies could earn huge profits.

Just because these innocent children are poor and vulnerable it does not mean that they deserve to be treated as guinea pigs for illegal and dangerous drug trials by big pharmaceutical companies.