I am posting 4 very prominent and

How Dr. Fauci, the Mainstream Media & WHO Used Fear to Convince You to Take Their COVID Shots

Published July 12, 2021


Dr Michael McDowell: Full Explanation Of SARSCoV2 BioWeapon Agenda "In response to the vaccine" Pt.1


The Covid-19 Genocide of 2020 - Claire Edwards. DO NOT MISS THIS!


WHAT ON EARTH IS GOING ON? Claire Edwards reveals the lies of COVID-19


Covid-19 Plans To Exterminate The Human Race - Rare Full Version 2009 True TV




Mind Blower! Before His Death, PCR Test Inventor

Blew the "BIG SHAM" Wide Open!

If Mullis couldn't get an answer to a very basic question dealing with the PROBABLE cause of THIS particular disease; If "scientists" are incentivized to publish disease causes WITHOUT evidence in order to secure grants, what does that say about the foundation of the entire medical industry?

Dr. Reiner Fullmich Starting Litigation on Validity of PCR Test


Listen to the Inventor of the PCR test ”It is just a proces that is used to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing ended up with really was gonna hurt you or anything like that” ext: Dr. Robert Gorter In the documentation standing that the PCR test is only for laboratorial purposes. With PCR test Normally 20 to 24 cycle. With Covid19 they use 40 to 44 cycles, then you find almost everything. To many false positive test when more cycles.
The PCR test is not suitable for medical diagnosis.

Part #1

Part #4

Part #5


Fauci Virus: Shocking new evidence proves covid-19 began with Dr. Anthony Fauci and NIAID

Wednesday, January 27, 2021 by:

Image: Fauci Virus: Shocking new evidence proves covid-19 began with Dr. Anthony Fauci and NIAID

(Natural News) An investigation into the origin of covid-19 has uncovered a final trail of evidence that directly links Dr. Anthony Fauci and the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to get unethical gain-of-function research on coronaviruses.

The gain-of-function research that was conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China was intended to engineer highly contagious viruses “to learn about treatments and vaccines” to understand how to respond to an actual outbreak.

The team that made this research possible was America’s very own public health experts at the NIAID, led by none other than Dr. Anthony Fauci, the number one expert in infectious diseases and leader of the federal coronavirus task force.

Fauci continued gain of function coronavirus research by secretly subcontracting it

The original gain-of-function research goes back ten years, with a Netherlands study that involved ferrets. The researchers wanted to see if coronaviruses could be genetically manipulated so they could be transferred through the air. After demonstrating airborne transmission with ferrets, the researchers wanted to replicate contagion in humans. This opened up an entirely new, controversial science that involved manipulation in the genetic code of viruses.

It was Dr. Fauci and the NIAID who funded the first ferret study. Ten years ago, Fauci co-wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post praising the research as “a risk worth taking.” He wrote, “Important information and insight can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory…”

The Wuhan virologists found that they could force an influenza virus to mutate and spread via aerosol droplets by injecting the virus from one ferret to another. By engineering the most lethal viruses in a laboratory setting, researchers believed they could better understand how to invent treatments and vaccines in the case of a real outbreak.

The Obama Administration put a halt on gain-of-function virology research in 2014, for fear of viruses leaking from the laboratory. This opened up an opportunity for Dr. Anthony Fauci to subcontract gain-of-function research on coronaviruses. Fauci concealed ongoing research through New York’s Eco Health Alliance. Dr. Fauci funded a project there to learn about the risk of new coronaviruses, and how they could emerge from wild animals to rapidly infect humans.

Dr. Fauci used the cover of EcoHealth Alliance to subcontract the research to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology. In order to continue receiving money, the head of the Wuhan lab, Dr. Shi Zhengli, reported back to Fauci on the progress they were making on coronaviruses.

Fauci, and the criminal network behind covid-19

Fauci commissioned Eco Health to find out what viruses could infect both animals and humans, using experimental genetic studies and virus infection experiments across a range of cell cultures from different species and humanized mice. Fauci commissioned and funded Peter Daszak, the zoologist who first discovered the bat origin of SARS ten years ago. Daszak off-shored a key part of the research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology under lab director Shi Zhengli, who was responsible for collecting bat samples.

Fauci ordered the institute to collect several samples of bat feces in caves. After isolating several coronaviruses from the bat feces, the Chinese virologists analyzed and sequenced their genetic information. Finally, they built genetically engineered viruses, or chimeras, and they went on to infect human cells, showing how the man-made viruses replicated. These genetic changes unlocked a unique doorway that allowed the virus to infect human cells with ease. The virus is known to attach to human cells ten to twenty times tighter than the first SARS virus.

“Until now, the only reporting of Dr. Fauci’s role in all of this has been his funding of the Wuhan lab in general,” said Steve Hilton, Fox News journalist. “But tonight we can go further thanks to this paper. We can see the specific activity that Dr. Fauci funded and it is terrifying — so terrifying that after we reached out to NIH this paper was mysteriously taken off-line on Friday for a while. But we downloaded it weeks ago.” Hilton is calling on Fauci to step down from his role as chief science advisor to the Biden administration until Americans can learn more about Fauci’s role in the covid-19 pandemic. Fauci must be held to account for off-shoring and guiding unethical, banned gain-of-function virus research.

This is a must watcch video about Anthony Fauci:

Sources include:


How many Americans really died FROM the China coronavirus? 

On Christmas Day the government’s television channel, PBS, reported on the the China coronavirus first thing.  This is all they talk about but they never mention China, they label the pandemic COVID-19:

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention made the announcement last night to help prevent the spread of new highly contagious COVID variants in Britain. That comes as the U.S. death toll surpassed 330,000. And hospitalizations nationwide hit a new record high yesterday, more than 120,000.

But this reporting is questionable. We reported in August that the CDC admits that only 6% of all deaths in the US classified as Coronavirus deaths actually died from the China Coronavirus alone.

Yes, this was from the CDC’s own reporting.  So today it looks like less than 20,000 deaths in the US (330,000 x 6% = 19,800) over the past year have actually been due to the coronavirus only.  The remainder of the deaths reported by the CDC include accidents, overdoses, suicides and those presumed to have had the coronavirus upon their death.

So basically many local and state governments are shutting down their local businesses and institutions due to over-inflated statistics regarding the number of Americans who died from this China oriented coronavirus.

The post Did 330,000 Americans Die ‘From’ the China Coronavirus Or Is It Closer to 20,000 Who Died ‘From’ the China Coronavirus? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.


SHOCK REPORT: This Week CDC Quietly Updated COVID-19 Numbers – Only 9,210 Americans Died From COVID-19 Alone – Rest Had Different Other Serious Illnesses

By Joe Hoft
Published August 29, 2020 at 7:45pm

So let’s get this straight – based on the recommendation of doctors Fauci and Birx the US shut down the entire economy based on 9,000 American deaths due entirely to the China coronavirus?

We were first to report that the Director General of the WHO on March 3, 2020 created panic with his highly flawed statement:

While many people globally have built up immunity to seasonal flu strains, COVID-19 is a new virus to which no one has immunity. That means more people are susceptible to infection, and some will suffer severe disease.

Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.

TRENDING: Tom Fitton Brilliantly Defends Rep. Gohmert in His Lawsuit Against VP Mike Pence to Resolve Election Results (VIDEO)

This statement caused a global panic. We, however, knew it was wrong and we wrote about it on March 17, 2020. Here is the video of Dr. Ghebreyesus’s remarks.

The WHO leader’s coronavirus death rate number of 3.4% was false and we proved this in our post at the time.

The Gateway Pundit reported, that the coronavirus fatality rate reported by the liberal mainstream media was completely inaccurate and the actual rate more typical to a seasonal flu – the media was lying again.

Do you trust Dr. Fauci?

Completing this poll entitles you to The Gateway Pundit news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Doctors Fauci and Birx next pushed ridiculous and highly exaggerated mortality rates related to the coronavirus:

** Dr. Tony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx used the Imperial College Model to persuade President Trump to lock down the ENTIRE US ECONOMY.
** The fraudulent model predicted 2.2 million American deaths from the coronavirus pandemic
** The authors of the Imperial College Model shared their findings with the White House Coronavirus task force in early March
** Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx then met with President Trump privately and urged him to shut down the US economy and destroy the record Trump economy based on this model

But the Imperial College model Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx pushed was garbage and they recommended the destruction of the US economy using this completely flawed model.
Today we now have empirical evidence that the WHO, Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx were all wrong. They were charlatans. They lied.

The CDC silently updated their numbers this week to show that only 6% of all coronavirus deaths were completely due to the coronavirus alone. The rest of the deaths pinned to the China coronavirus are attributed to individuals who had other serious issues going on.

Also, most of the deaths are very old Americans with co-morbidities.

(Note we updated this post with tweet above because Twitter took down Mel Q’s tweet after we published this post. We also included a screengrab from the CDC webpage.)

From the CDC.

Not only are the number of deaths linked entirely to the China coronavirus minuscule, but the virus appears to be naturally dying out.

Okay just added in approx trend for testing rate per thousand people for each country
– shown in red at top of graphs – this thing is insane — Ivor Cummins (@FatEmperor) August 18, 2020

The data above from Europe shows that the number of cases has little correlation to the number of deaths.
Let’s face it – at this moment in time anyone who is pushing for more lockdowns and other abuses on our personal rights is either evil or terribly misinformed.

Aug 4 2020

Video at the link below, wait until the first advertisements are done!


CDC Admits That 94 Percent of “COVID-19 Deaths” Had Other Causes/Conditions

August 30, 2020 By Arjun Walia

In Brief
The Facts:
According to the CDC, for 6% of the deaths attributed to COVID-19, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For all other deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.
Reflect On:

Have death rates been inflated? Why is there so much conflicting information out there about Covid-19? Is this due to a lack of transparency? Does the politicization of science have anything to do with it? Why is the only solution a vaccine?

What Happened: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), out of all the deaths that have been labelled as a COVID-19 death in the United States so far, for 6% of them “COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned” and for 94% of the deaths, there were other causes and conditions in addition to COVID-19. The CDC states that “for deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.”

This is shown in “Table 3.”

What does this mean? It means that for the majority of deaths that have been attributed to COVID-19, the new virus may not have been the cause of the death, perhaps it may have contributed to the deaths, or at least is suspected to have done so, but this remains unclear as there is no statement given. This doesn’t mean that those 94% did not die of covid or that covid did not contribute to their death. It’s been well documented that people with comorbidities are much more susceptible and these stats from the CDC further that point.

There have also been many claims around the internet that people who have died in car accidents and other causes have been marked as a Covid death if they test positive, but I haven’t been able to substantiate that information.

We saw this early on in the pandemic. For example, a study published in Italy shows that 99 percent of people who had died so far from COVID 19 at the time of the study had pre-existing medical conditions that made them more susceptible to death. You can access that and read more about it here.

It’s important to note that this is something new, for example, we do not see people who die of a heart attack tested to see if they have the flu. What’s been happening here is that if someone dies of a heart-attack but tests positive for COVID-19, it’s also marked as a covid death. Whether or not covid contributed to these deaths, again, remains unclear.

There have been some eye-opening statements from health authorities all over the world that seem to have emphasized that some deaths that are clearly not a result of covid, but of something else, have again, also been marked as a covid death if the patient tested positive. This has been a common theme throughout the pandemic.

For example, Dr. Ngozi Ezike, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health, recently stated that, even if it’s clear one died of an alternative cause, their death will still be marked as a COVID death.

If you were in hospice and had already been given a few weeks to live and then you were also found to have COVID, that would be counted as COVID death, despite if you died of a clear alternative cause it’s still listed as a COVID death. So, everyone who is listed as a COVID death that doesn’t mean that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of death. (source)

Another example comes from Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Toronto Public Health tweeted in late June that “Individuals who have died with COVID-19, but not as a result of COVID-19, are included in the case counts for COVID-19 deaths in Toronto.” (source) You can read more about this story here.

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment announced a change to how it tallies coronavirus deaths amid complaints that it inflated numbers. Rep. Mark Baisley, asked asked 18th Judicial District Attorney George Brauchler to investigate whether the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE) broke the law by classifying several deaths at a Centennial senior living facility as coronavirus deaths when they really weren’t the result of the coronavirus. As a result, a change in the way deaths were categorized took place. You can read more about that story here.

Vittorio Sgarbi, Italian politician Mayor of Sutri, gave an emotional speech at a hearing on the 24th of April where he emphasized that the number of deaths in Italy due to COVID-19 are completely false and that the people are being lied to. He stated his belief that governments were doing this to exercise more control over the population. This sentiment echoes the thoughts of many notable people, like Dr. Ron Paul for example, and also NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden.

It’s also important to mention the research and opinions of many health experts who have been emphasizing that the case-fatality rate of COVID-19 is very similar to a severe flu. For example, Ronald B. Brown, Ph.D., from the the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada says, based on his research, that the coronavirus fatality rates we were/are given represents “Worst Miscalculation in Human History.” You can read more about that story here.

Dr. Brown added that CDC and WHO documents show that the case fatality rate for influenza was similar to the coronavirus, implying that the lockdowns were pointless. His paper questions why the 2017-2018 influenza season in the United States did not “receive the same intensive media coverage as COVID-19.”

The Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) recently published a report titled “Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.” According to them, the infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26%. You can read more about that here.

John P. A. Ioannidis, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University has said that the infection fatality rate is close to 0 percent for people under the age of 45 years old, explaining how that number rises significantly for people who are older, as with most other respiratory viruses. You can read more about that and access that here. In fact, not long ago a study published by several academics from the Stanford School of Medicine suggests that COVID-19 has a similar infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza, you can read more about that and access the study here.

If all of the deaths that have been attributed to COVID-19 that are not a result of it are included in these calculations, and if infection rates are much higher than the numbers say, which seems to be the general consensus in the scientific community, this would drive the infection fatality rate even lower than the numbers above.

This is one of many reasons why so many doctors and scientists around the world have been emphasizing from the very beginning that lockdown measures and more and completely unnecessary, harmful, and don’t really make any sense. For example, More than 500 German doctors & scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called the “Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee” to do just this. You can read more about that story here.

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history is also part of Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee mentioned above and has also expressed the same thing, multiple times early on in the pandemic all the way up to today.

Implementation of the current draconian measures that are so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly, exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us. Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19? I assert that the answer is simply, no. – Bhakdi. You can read more about him here.

Why This Is Important: This type of information is important because it’s just that, information. What makes it even more important is that the thousands of scientists and doctors all over the world who are sharing opinions, research, and data that seems to contradict what we’ve been given from organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) are being heavily censored, and in some cases ridiculed. A lot of the information presented in this article is never really presented by the mainstream media, and as a result the masses are usually beamed with a one-sided perception while these same networks simply ridicule and label any opposing information that threatens their narrative as a “conspiracy theory.”

There is a lot of information out there when it comes to COVID-19, and there is a lot that’s confusing and seems to contradict itself. It can be difficult to know what exactly is going on, but one thing is for certain, information from credible sources that are separate from government health regulatory agencies and big health organizations should not be censored and ridiculed, but rather discussed and shared openly and transparently.

We live in a world where big interests seem to dominate politics and science, another great reason why discussion should never really be censored.

The Takeaway:

This public awakening to what happens behind the scenes in our world is a powerful and primary process in the overall evolution of humanity’s consciousness. As we expose and do away with a world built on separation, conflict, and ego, we awaken to a consciousness that wishes to create a world of unity, connection, and one where all life can thrive. 

Understanding what’s going on here, or at least attempting to through the process of critical thinking and questioning, is all part of the process. In an ideal world there would be complete transparency of all issues, but today we have a digital authoritarian “fact-checker” that seems to be patrolling the internet telling people what is and what isn’t instead of allowing people to make up their own minds. You are not stupid, and you have the ability to think for yourself!
Don’t ever forget that.

UN-Linked Biotech Expert Claims COVID-19 Is Man-Made Bioweapon From Chinese Military Lab
AUGUST 12, 2020


The explosive charges come from Tritto’s new book, China COVID 19: The Chimera That Changed The World.

Published in Italian, the nearly 300-page book contends that China conducted bioengineering experiments with financial and personnel assistance from France and the U.S. While the collaboration sought to develop vaccines against diseases such as SARS, it morphed into more dangerous research under the auspices of the Chinese military. Specifically, Tritto alleges that the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s P4 lab used “reverse genetics” – a process whereby scientists alter disease pathogens – to build lethal bioweapons. While charges that COVID-19 was a man-made bioweapon have been dismissed by the mainstream media, Tritto’s credentials have the potential to lend serious credibility to his findings. 

As Executive President of the World Academy of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies, he oversees an institution which regularly collaborates with United Nations (UN) agencies such as United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO.) The UN is the body that oversees the World Health Organization (WHO), tasked with overseeing the world’s COVID-19 response and frequently accused of subservience to the Chinese Communist Party. Tritto adds that the program director, Dr. Shi Zhengli, was encouraged by People’s Liberation Army (PLA) experts to reappropriate the lab to focus on the construction of bioweapons. Concerning U.S. involvement, professors who had received major grants from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease were named in the book as working on the venture.

The Chinese Communist Party continues to refuse to release details about the virus. Details necessary for creating an effective vaccine. “Providing the matrix virus would have meant admitting that COVID-19 was created in the laboratory. In fact, the incomplete genome made available by China lacks some inserts of AIDS amino acids, which itself is a smoking gun,” Tritto explains. Admissions of guilt would open the floodgates for the Chinese Communist Party to be held legally and financially accountable for spawning and spreading the disease. The coronavirus has now mutated, affecting the efficacy of any vaccine: 

“Given the many mutations of COVID-19, it is extremely unlikely that a single vaccine that blocks the virus will be found. At the moment 11 different strains have been identified: the A2a genetic line which developed in Europe and the B1 genetic line which took root in North America are more contagious than the 0 strain originating in Wuhan. I therefore believe that, at the most, a multivalent vaccine can be found effective on 4-5 strains and thus able to cover 70-75% of the world’s population.”

Proving yet again: China lied, people died.

We know that there is an agenda of the New World Order that calls for the depopulation of the planet, so every chance they have to conceal, deceive and cause sickness and disease to kill people they will do it. So here is part of this evil process!
Contract tracing is the New World Orders way of taking away your privacy, and eventually forcing you to take a vaccine!
Does This CDC Study Deliver the Knockout Blow in the COVID Lockdown Debate?

Matt Vespa

Posted: May 24, 2020 4:30 AM

Source: AP Photo/Arek Rataj

For weeks, the nation’s economy has been under lockdown to curb the spread of the Wuhan Coronavirus. It’s contagious. That’s true, but in the span of a few days, the entire COVID narrative has virtually collapsed. We still don’t have enough testing regarding antibodies, though preliminary results show that the infection rate could be immensely higher than what is reported, with higher recovery numbers. It was said to be spread mostly through surfaces. That was revised on Thursday:

Georgia has re-opened and no Armageddon has followed. Florida was supposed to be a graveyard by now. It’s not. Eight weeks in, COVID case and deaths remain lower than other hard-hit areas along the Acela Corridor. In the meantime, we’ve had Democratic governors used the virus to carve out power grabs. There is no reason for Michigan Gov. Gretchen Witmer to extend the stay-at-home order until June 12th. It’s madness. I supported the lockdowns to curb the spread and prevent the hospitals from being overrun. The spread of this thing was also impacting the markets as well. Well, the curve has been flattened. The hospitals were not overwhelmed like what we saw in Italy. Mission accomplished. It’s time to re-open. 

While all of this was going on, millions of Americans were forced into the unemployment line, small businesses were pinched, and even big retail giants were filing for bankruptcy protection. Some are very lucky that they can work from home, the vast majority cannot. And the last three weeks or so has been a cacophony of nonsense. Are face masks good when it comes to combating this thing? Also, and most importantly, what’s the real mortality rate? That alone is the silver bullet. Forget the masks, standing six feet apart, etc. if it’s just like the flu, open everything back up now, not piecemeal. It’s not necessary. And the Center for Disease Control and Prevention doled out a study (via Conservative Review):

Most people are more likely to wind up six feet under because of almost anything else under the sun other than COVID-19.

The CDC just came out with a report that should be earth-shattering to the narrative of the political class, yet it will go into the thick pile of vital data and information about the virus that is not getting out to the public. For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged ita month ago.

Until now, we have been ridiculed for thinking the death rate was that low, as opposed to the 3.4% estimate of the World Health Organization, which helped drive the panic and the lockdowns. Now the CDC is agreeing to the lower rate in plain ink.

Plus, ultimately we might find out that the IFR is even lower because numerous studies and hard counts of confined populations have shown a much higher percentage of asymptomatic cases. Simply adjusting for a 50% asymptomatic rate would drop their fatality rate to 0.2% – exactly the rate of fatality Dr. John Ionnidis of Stanford University projected.

Some of you have been sharing and voicing skepticism over the numbers and the policies that have been born from them. What can I say? Maybe I overreacted. To those who were right, keep spreading the word. Yet, I‘M also certain that the political class wouldn’t have acted differently. A pandemic going around when registered Democrats are in office is just inviting disaster, as we’ve seen in New York. Actually, that’s not quite fair. 

For any leader in a position to protect its citizenry, including Trump, a lockdown and a ‘better safe than sorry’ mentality is what probably would've won out in this situation. Suppose COVID was going to be as bad as some people projected? At the time, would you, as a politician, roll the dice? There’s going to be a lot of 'Monday Morning quarterbacking here, given the new figures. Hell, Dr. Anthony Fauci, one of Trump’s top Wuhan coronavirus task force members, now says staying inside for too long isn’t good, as it could cause “irreparable damage”:

Stay-at-home orders intended to curb the spread of the coronavirus could end up causing “irreparable damage” if imposed for too long, White House health advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci told CNBC on Friday.

“I don’t want people to think that any of us feel that staying locked down for a prolonged period of time is the way to go,” Fauci said during an interview with CNBC’s Meg Tirrell on “Halftime Report.”

Meanwhile, Germany has opened back up, no issues. In Japan, they did none of the drastic measures we saw enacted and they’re about to re-open. 

We still don’t know enough about this virus. Keeping people inside because you don’t know some stuff about a disease isn’t sufficient to keep people inside, especially when the initial goal has been met here. It’s time to re-open America. Does this CDC study deliver a death blow to those who want to stay inside until there’s a cure? Probably not, but to the wider electorate—It’s could be quite a different take, especially those running family-owned businesses who have been brutalized by this pandemic. These folks would rather risk infection than lose everything, and based on this new data set, I don’t blame them.

The next thing to be revised is the total death toll, which many of you said would be lower. Though not highlighted, and 
probably ignored by the liberal media, even Dr. Deborah Birx said that the administration was casting a big net concerning COVID deaths until a clearer picture was established. That was weeks ago. Ellie and Katie both wrote about it. Also, let's not forget that China has the most deaths. We all know this. We also know that this virus is their fault as well.

UPDATES: I forgot to mention that North Carolina's COVID death toll projection has been significantly reduced (via WRAL):

New modeling from a group of researchers at the University of Washington has significantly cut the number of COVID-19 deaths expected in North Carolina through August.

Projections from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation now forecast more than 2,500 deaths from the disease through Aug. 4. That's down about 40 percent from the group's projection last week of 4,400 deaths.

Daily deaths are still expected to peak in mid- to late-June, but at a lower rate of nearly 30 a day.

As of May 20, the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services has tallied about 700 deaths from COVID-19 in the state.





Author: Dennis M. Bushnell
Organisation: NASA Langley Research Center
Publish Date: 2011
Country: Global
Sector: Research
Method: Forecasting
Theme: Protection
Type: Presentation
Language: English
Tags: Warfare, Future, Politics, IT Revolution, Bio revolution, Volumetric weaponry, Robotics

Jun 3, 2020, 6:43 PM

Mark Aldrich,
Aug 13, 2020, 9:46 PM
Mark Aldrich,
Aug 13, 2020, 9:46 PM